少了四驅與後懸吊差異的Juke，威嗎？:－2016阿基師年菜食譜大全 , 家常年菜食譜大全 , 素食年菜食譜大全 , 簡易年菜食譜大全 , 年菜食譜 , 年菜食譜做法 , 阿基師年菜食譜 ,

Blogtrottr

Mobile01最新文章

Manage your social media

Best social media tool for image publishing to Facebook and Twitter. Look amazing and delight your followers. Get 40% off when you sign up today.

From our sponsors

少了四驅與後懸吊差異的Juke，威嗎？

Sep 30th 2013, 09:47

就在賞完好幾次的JUKE(裕昌和生)
並在今天完成1.6T的試駕(裕昌一心)
好掙扎呀...
感覺這車就是要敗TB版
但偏偏只是老婆要用來通勤代步用，理論上NA版應該足矣~
小弟會偶爾輪流著開啦~

我想請問各位懂車的先進~
少了四驅與後懸吊差異的JUKE，NA版，扭力樑~
這樣的JUKE底盤極限到底扼殺多少????

不是看不起扭力樑，因凡事都需再細看調校功力
月初賞PEUGEOT的208和208GTI，甚至傳說中的RCZ
與網站查到的205GTI，都是半拖曳臂(後托曳臂加扭力桿的懸吊設計???)
不是Golf的或其他多連桿四連桿六連桿
所以底盤之於操控，是看整體設計甚至前後配重!!

或許最後會像各大試駕文寫的NA版心得
NA版，底盤極限，高過引擎能力
就算NA版底盤不若TB版，但配1.6NA動力之下仍綽綽有餘了，是嗎？

以上有點像自己發問，又自己解答一樣
請pH值小於5.5的酸民放過小弟一馬
因為我知道生活中不見得逢彎必殺
但若偶爾想熱血，拉拉1.6的轉速樂一樂
這....你....我.....

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers. Five Filters recommends:

Massacres That Matter - Part 1 - 'Responsibility To Protect' In Egypt, Libya And Syria
Massacres That Matter - Part 2 - The Media Response On Egypt, Libya And Syria
National demonstration: No attack on Syria - Saturday 31 August, 12 noon, Temple Place, London, UK

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions